Democratic Renewal

Overview and Background

Columbia World Projects’ (CWP) research and engagement work on democratic renewal explores what sustains and ails liberal democracies around the world and how to revitalize democratic institutions that appear fragile and fraying.

By developing a comparative understanding of the trends and factors that sustain the institutions that undergird democracies, our work identifies new choices that encourage effective problem-solving and civic participation. We work in partnership with government, civic organizations, nonprofits and academic researchers in order to produce reports and develop communities of practice that advocate for and, in some cases, implement recommendations that emerge from our work. 
 

Ongoing Projects

Digital Platform Governance

There are significant harms that arise from the concentrated power of a few very large firms that control technology platforms, thus shaping democratic outcomes, market transactions, information flows, and social life. To address these concerns, this initiative examines prospects for the regulation of digital platforms through two complementary networks. The first, with support from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation and in partnership with the Center for Digital Governance at the Hertie School, brings together European and United States policymakers, regulators, and researchers with the goal of mutual learning and policy development. Learn more about this project.

A second network joins comparable persons in the global south. Both assess opportunities for regulation that preserve and protect democratic processes and institutions while addressing central concerns about firm size, uncurated content, and insecurity. This work is an outgrowth of a past initiative, “Strategic Foresight and Collaboration Between the U.S. and Europe.”

Renewing Democratic Participation

No successful democracy can thrive without an open and diverse civic culture. At a time of political and societal polarization, the need to improve the effectiveness of American representative democracy appears more urgent than ever. To address these concerns, this initiative builds on a series of conversations from 2019 to consider how to strengthen an inclusive conception of “We the People.” Supported by a $500,000 grant from Carnegie Corporation of New York and in partnership with the Ash Center for Democracy at Harvard and the SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins, this project generates new thinking and solutions to enhance democratic institutions’ responsiveness and rebuild a vibrant civic culture. Focusing on political parties, deliberative instruments, and civic associations as key links between state and society, CWP establishes a network of scholars, practitioners, and policymakers to ask how democratic institutions can contribute to a shared peoplehood that is inclusive and pluralistic.

Previous Initiatives 

Election Infrastructure 

This initiative – which gathered law faculty, political scientists, leaders from grassroots organizations and election officials – analyzed current barriers to voting, what constitutes a healthy electoral system and how to broadly adopt good practices in service of designing a bipartisan, independent election architecture that increases voter participation and safeguards election integrity. An initial working group within this initiative assessed the high variation of local practices and standards in order to identify fragilities. The group also explored the legislative, infrastructure, training and personnel moves that enabled the electoral system’s stability. CWP’s report, Building Trust: Election Administration and the Role of Higher Education, captures the group’s recommendations concerning how universities might address the trust deficit vexing US elections. 

Barriers and Borders

Territorial boundaries can be external, separating states and empires from each other, or internal, as in federal sovereign units, or both. Human boundaries, which sometimes, but not always, coincide with territorial ones, govern patterns of migration, membership and citizenship, and the social and economic as well as political and symbolic hierarchies of power and difference. In partnership with the Centre for History and Economics at the University of Cambridge, this initiative sought to understand the conditions under which boundaries become barriers for people, ideas, and goods that obstruct access and bar entry and participation to places or roles reserved only for some. More information on this initiative and publications from past gatherings.

Fault Lines in Indian Politics 

This working group brought together researchers and journalists to explore federalism in the world’s largest democracy. Cooperation between India’s states and its federal government will be crucial to mounting an effective response to rising challenges to Indian democratic institutions, and to addressing core concerns about the country’s governance. This working group identified and proposed to policymakers and legislators means of strengthening institutional mechanisms and platforms for resolving disputes between state and federal government while also exploring the stakes of these disputes. The group’s launch meeting was in October 2019 and considered the fate of India’s constitutional democracy. 

Strategic Foresight and Collaboration Between the U.S. and Europe

This initiative emerged from a joint commitment by Klaus Welle, Secretary General of the European Parliament, and Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger to deepen ties between Columbia University and the European Union. It assessed how these challenges are shaping the agenda for policymakers on both sides of the Atlantic over the coming decade. An initial meeting was held in February 2019. A second meeting, held in January 2021, brought Columbia faculty together with senior EU officials to explore pathways to a sustainable recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on public health, democratic renewal, climate change and economic inequality.